Otter.ai

A draft record, not the final minutes

Otter offers transcription, summaries, and action-item features, with meeting integrations listed for Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet. Check the official product overview for the capture method and plan appropriate to your setup. Treat its output as a draft record that someone owns, rather than a definitive account of what everyone agreed.

Test decision accuracy

Use a meeting you are authorized to record. Include a proposal that is rejected, a revised deadline, and two speakers with similar names. Review whether the summary distinguishes a suggestion from an agreed action, keeps the final deadline, and assigns the work to the right person.

For each action, keep a short checklist: owner, deliverable, due date, and the supporting passage in the recording or transcript. Mark unresolved items explicitly. A fluent summary with an incorrect owner can create more follow-up work than a rough transcript.

Recording and sharing are separate decisions

Notify participants and obtain consent where required by law and your organization's rules. Check whether the recording method is permitted by the meeting host. Before sharing, inspect who can open the transcript, whether a link grants broader access than intended, and how recordings and exports are deleted or retained.

Review the current plan's meeting limits, imports, retention, and administration features. If your goal is editing an interview into a finished episode, compare Descript; that is a different workflow from keeping meeting notes. For occasional meetings, manual notes may still be simpler once consent, checking, and cleanup are included. This directory has not independently measured Otter's transcription accuracy.

Sources checked: 2026-09-15. Read our editorial policy or report a correction.